
The Geopolitics of Critical Minerals: How Rare Earths Became the New Oil
📚What You Will Learn
- Why rare earths rival oil in strategic importance.
- China's multilayered control tactics.
- Western responses like alliances and stockpiles.
- Challenges in diversifying supply chains.
- 2026 policy shifts impacting global markets.
📝Summary
ℹ️Quick Facts
đź’ˇKey Takeaways
Rare earth elements (REEs) are essential for magnets in EVs, wind turbines, defense tech, and electronics. China dominates, refining 70% of strategic minerals and 94% of REE magnets. In 2026, Beijing imposed export controls, limiting silver exporters to 44 firms, tungsten to 15, and antimony to 11—echoing its 2010 Japan embargo.
These moves signal 'weaponization' of supply chains. France's aerospace sector, 90% dependent on Chinese REEs, warns of vulnerabilities. Spot prices for REEs used in permanent magnets surged due to controls.
The US, under Trump, prioritizes resource independence, undoing Biden-era mining bans in Minnesota for copper, nickel, cobalt. The DoD took equity in MP Materials with guaranteed offtake at double China spot prices.
A January 2026 G7+ meeting in Washington, including EU, Australia, India, drew 60% of global demand players to discuss price floors, stockpiles, and investments against China's curbs on Japan. Policies now drive a 'political bull market' for REEs.
Greenland boasts significant REE deposits, but harsh Arctic conditions stall mining. US lobbied to block Chinese buyout of Tanbreez, sold to US firm Critical Metals.
Even if extracted, refining stays China-dominated, limiting diversification. Experts debunk Greenland as a quick fix. Tensions over it strain US-EU ties.
A US-China 'truce' resumed magnet exports but restricts raw oxides, hindering US processing. End-users demand non-Chinese sources; premiums emerge for diversified REEs.
2026 sees exclusionary practices, policy-driven investments, and US-China divergence. Critical minerals dictate politics, with stakes higher than ever in this high-tech power game.